Jaunius PinelisAI & Engineering Consultancy
Services

Four ways in. All of them start with a conversation.

Engagements are scoped to the decision you’re facing — an audit, a build, an evaluation layer, or a team that needs to become fluent fast.

01

AI strategy & advisory

The most expensive AI mistakes are made before any code is written. I work with leadership and engineering together to separate the use cases that will pay for themselves from the ones that will consume a quarter and produce a slide.

I've done this as an internal technical advisor for AI product procurement, POC initiatives and cross-department integrations — so the recommendation accounts for security, compliance and the team you actually have.

Typical output
  • Prioritised use-case map with effort and risk
  • Build vs. buy recommendation per capability
  • Vendor and model shortlist with rationale
  • 90-day sequenced delivery plan
02

Agent & LLM product build

Hands-on delivery: assistants, retrieval systems, agents with real tool access, and the automations around them. Python and FastAPI on the backend, Next.js or React where there's a UI, LangChain or Haystack where it earns its place.

Previously: a generative AI assistant platform and LLM proxy for a Nordic bank's developers, an internal enterprise ChatGPT with proper authentication, and agents plus MCP servers at a consumer health product.

Typical output
  • Working system in your cloud, not a notebook
  • Model gateway / proxy with access control
  • Retrieval and vector search layer
  • Handover to your engineers, documented
03

Evaluation & LLM ops

If you can't measure your AI feature, you can't improve it and you can't defend it. I build the evaluation layer: LLM-judge frameworks, curated test sets, regression runs wired into your pipelines and dashboards.

Built on Databricks with Airflow orchestration in a previous role, and on plain CI where that's the right size for the team.

Typical output
  • Eval suite with agreed quality metrics
  • Automated regression on every prompt change
  • Observability, tracing and cost visibility
  • Release criteria your team can hold
04

Training & team enablement

Teaching is half my career. I've authored and delivered AI engineering, agentic coding, generative AI with Python, and full-stack .NET programmes for professional cohorts — including bespoke academies shaped around one company's stack and standards.

For teams, this usually looks like a short intensive on agentic coding and AI-assisted development, followed by pairing on your real codebase.

Typical output
  • Workshop tailored to your codebase
  • Internal playbook and conventions
  • Code review and architecture sessions
  • One-to-one mentoring for senior engineers
How an engagement runs
A call, free

45 minutes on the actual problem. You leave with a direction whether or not we work together.

A written scope

Fixed outcome, timeline and price. No open-ended retainers unless you want one.

Delivery in the open

I work inside your repos and channels, with your engineers, so knowledge stays after I leave.

Not sure which of these you need? That’s usually the first thing to figure out.

Email me